Comments on: Is Swine Flu a Manufactured Virus?

By: yeah

yeah — Thu, 23 Sep 2010 13:25:26 +0000

I agree with you, but I will not provide any info. all this shit is created by governments and company labs to make billions. I no longer support vaccinations (unnecessary ones), and I will be as healthy as possible without them.

By: Flu Shot Guy

Flu Shot Guy — Wed, 25 Nov 2009 22:49:19 +0000

Do I ever love it when somebody starts attacking another person’s attitude when they feel their point of view is threatened. Grow up guys, we ain’t in elementary any more ( well, maybe some of us are)

In a recent article in ” The New England Journal of Medicine” by Shanta M. Zimmer, M.D. and Donald S. Burke, M.D. entitled “Historical Perspective — Emergence of Influenza A (H1N1) Viruses” http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/full/361/3/279

They break down the history of the virus ( Sorry YouConspiracyTheoristsAreRetards & spectator )

A couple of things fronm the paper to enlighten you guys:

Extinction of Human H1N1 Virus (1957):

Influenza A (H1N1) abruptly disappeared from humans in 1957 and was replaced by a new reassortant virus that combined genes from the H1N1 strain and an avian virus. This new influenza A (H2N2) strain contained three new segments from the avian source and maintained the other five segments from the H1N1 strain of 1918 lineage.17 After this pandemic subtype emerged, human influenza A (H1N1) was not detected again until 1977.18 Reasons for the complete disappearance of this strain in 1957 are not clear, but it is likely that high levels of existing homologous immunity, coupled with a burst of heterologous immunity from the new H2N2 strain, were sufficient to eliminate the virus.

H1N1 Reemergence in Humans (1977):

Even though human influenza A (H1N1) virus had not circulated since 1957 and the swine influenza A (H1N1) virus that had been identified at Fort Dix did not extend outside the base, in November 1977, the H1N1 strain reemerged in the former Soviet Union, Hong Kong, and northeastern China. This strain affected primarily young people in a relatively mild presentation.18,30 Careful study of the genetic origin of the virus showed that it was closely related to a 1950 strain but dissimilar to influenza A (H1N1) strains from both 1947 and 1957. This finding suggested that the 1977 outbreak strain had been preserved since 1950.30 The reemergence was probably an accidental release from a laboratory source in the setting of waning population immunity to H1 and N1 antigens.19,31

Conclusions:

The history of influenza A (H1N1) virus is punctuated by frequent, sporadic cross-species transmissions from swine to humans. Although the sporadically transmitted swine viruses are sufficiently pathogenic in humans to cause clinically apparent disease, they are rarely transmitted among humans. Exposure and infection are necessary but not sufficient for a new epidemic virus to emerge; the virus must also adapt and transmit.12 The one prominent exception to the general rule that these swine viruses are not transmitted among humans was the outbreak at Fort Dix. This virus was never transmitted beyond the military installation, probably because the intrinsic transmissibility of the virus was simply too low. Yet the global response to this outbreak was forceful, especially given that the outbreak self-quenched. The decision to mass-vaccinate the U.S. population resulted in the unfortunately large cluster of Guillain–Barré cases. Perhaps an even more serious consequence was the accidental release of human-adapted influenza A (H1N1) virus from a research study, with subsequent resurrection and global spread of this previously extinct virus, leading to what could be regarded as a “self-fulfilling prophecy” epidemic. The 1998 triple reassortant influenza A (H1N1) swine virus has shown what appears to be a proclivity to jump the species barrier and cause swine-to-human infections.

Everything is documented in the article. When we seek the truth, it will appear.

By: Joe

Joe — Thu, 24 Sep 2009 18:18:48 +0000

“Not only did we think the government should have a say”..

This seems to be a typo. I’m guessing he meant “should not”?

By: Linda

Linda — Sat, 29 Aug 2009 22:43:23 +0000

Personally, I think the media has over-hyped the swine flu. I am sick and tired or hearing about it and the vaccine! I couldn’t figure out why the media can’t seem to let this go, until I was watching the evening news the other night. At least 75% of the ads were from big Pharma. Duh!!! Follow the money on that.

I’m not sure I agree the virus was manufactured, but I do think the media frenzy certainly is!

By: Abe

Abe — Sun, 26 Jul 2009 21:32:35 +0000

I like Ron Paul too, Congressman Ron Paul… He isn’t the governor of Texas. Please correct this error in your article.

By: Blandy

Blandy — Thu, 23 Jul 2009 16:30:33 +0000

There is something to this. I am skeptical about anykind of pandemic that requires the media to push us all into a state of panic when really all I see is a few people with some sniffles. When you tie this in with some other “conspiracies” then it makes sense for right now. Creating panic will result in them being able to do alot more behind closed doors. Our attention is elsewhere. Notice this all happened right around when people cottoned on to the fact that the private bankers destroyed our economies because they wish to bring in a one world monetray fund, and that too I didnt believe until I did my oqn research and figured out that it was fact. Not only that but this allows them to work closer with other countries and it has lead to them setting up a one world health organisation which will now administer all world health problems with more efficiency. As for the first post, I agree with some of what you are saying, it would be more profitable for them in the long term, but what if global warming was actually something that threatened them as civilisation builders. If it does happen we are all screwed, they say we need to be sustainable, so what is a sustainable population for them, a billion, a couple hundred million? Either way they know that they need to reduce population, so somethign like this would go down well for them. Here is a quote from the Queens husband: Prince Philip, In His Own Words: “In the event that I am reincarnated, I would like to return as a deadly virus, in order to contribute something to solve overpopulation.” Reported by Deutsche Press Agentur (DPA), August, 1988

By: TrueAnarchist

TrueAnarchist — Tue, 30 Jun 2009 21:18:37 +0000

Its all true! The government engineered a virus then put a guy up to it who was the one testing Anthrax in the photo. They seek out and put people who know about their plan in electroshock therapy that kills their brain cells to erase their memory! THIS CONSPIRACY IS TRUE! Why do you think they put me on so much medication and shipped me off to solitary confinement for six months? Because I launch Nuclear Missles by JUST WHISTLING INTO A PHONE! EVERYONE, GO TO THE DESERT! ALL THE ANSWERS AWAIT YOU THERE! AKBAR ALLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLAH!!!!!!!!!!!!

By: Al Harris

Al Harris — Thu, 18 Jun 2009 15:13:49 +0000

Come on guys this can’t be true….government/industry involved in the manufacture of viruses simply to boost short term profits by increased vaccine sales!!

Think about it….sure, they could manufacture and release a virus and then “just so happen” to have massive stocks of an effective vaccine available at $XX.XX per course but even a jaded cynical psychopathic CEO/politician/military man would realise that people are worth more alive than dead. No sound minded, cynical, ammoral industrialist/government would, for the sake of a short term profit spike, deliberately (potentially) kill-off a bunch of people who will be paying taxes and buying medications for trivial illnesses for the next 40-60 years. The notorious “they” are smarter than that. “They” (being the highly intelligent, business-minded, moral vacuums that conspiracy theorists would have us believe – snigger) would take a longer term view and see that the masses can be milked more profitably over the long-term.

Perhaps a small “experiment” or two here or there isn’t beneath “them”, but to create and then spread HIV/ebola/H5N1/etc. (which, if properly dispersed and untreated, actually can kill en masse relatively effectively and sometimes even quickly) just doesn’t make business sense.

If I was a “big pharma” CEO, I’d much rather have a large population always suffering from trivial medical complaints (colds, flus, minor infections, chronic treatable/manageable conditions, cancers, etc. – as people naturally do) continually filling prescriptions and my bank account, than get involved in some short-sighted and potentially damaging attempt to boost short-term profits. But that’s just me.

Just one point of view…but worth considering, wouldn’t you say?